🔗 Share this article

Avril Coleridge-Taylor always bore the pressure of her parent’s heritage. As the offspring of the celebrated composer Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, among the best-known English composers of the turn of the 20th century, the composer’s name was enveloped in the long shadows of the past.

An Inaugural Recording

Not long ago, I reflected on these shadows as I made arrangements to produce the first-ever recording of her 1936 piano concerto. Featuring intense musical themes, soulful lyricism, and confident beats, this piece will grant audiences valuable perspective into how the composer – a composer during war originating from the early 1900s – conceived of her existence as a woman of colour.

Past and Present

But here’s the thing about shadows. It requires time to acclimate, to perceive forms as they actually appear, to distinguish truth from distortion, and I was reluctant to address the composer’s background for a period.

I had so wanted the composer to be her father’s daughter. Partially, she was. The rustic British sounds of parental inspiration can be detected in numerous compositions, such as From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). But you only have to examine the names of her parent’s works to see how he identified as both a standard-bearer of UK romantic tradition and also a advocate of the African diaspora.

At this point Samuel and Avril seemed to diverge.

American society judged Samuel by the excellence of his compositions as opposed to the colour of his skin.

Family Background

While he was studying at the Royal College of Music, her father – the son of a African father and a British mother – started to lean into his African roots. At the time the poet of color the renowned Dunbar came to London in that era, the 21-year-old composer eagerly sought him out. He composed Dunbar’s African Romances into music and the following year adapted his verses for an opera, Dream Lovers. This was followed by the choral composition that established his reputation: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Inspired by the poet Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, this composition was an worldwide sensation, particularly among Black Americans who felt shared pride as the majority assessed his work by the excellence of his compositions rather than the colour of his skin.

Advocacy and Beliefs

Success failed to diminish Samuel’s politics. At the turn of the century, he was present at the initial Pan African gathering in the UK where he made the acquaintance of the African American intellectual this influential figure and observed a series of speeches, such as the oppression of African people in South Africa. He was a campaigner throughout his life. He kept connections with early civil rights leaders including the scholar and the educator Washington, spoke publicly on ending discrimination, and even engaged in dialogue on racial problems with President Theodore Roosevelt while visiting to the presidential residence in 1904. Regarding his compositions, the scholar reflected, “he established his reputation so notably as a composer that it will long be remembered.” He succumbed in the early 20th century, aged 37. However, how would Samuel have reacted to his daughter’s decision to work in South Africa in the that decade?

Conflict and Policy

“Child of Celebrated Artist shows support to South African policy,” ran a headline in the Black American publication Jet magazine. The system “struck me as the right policy”, Avril told Jet. When asked to explain, she qualified her remarks: she was not in favor with apartheid “in principle” and it “ought to be permitted to resolve itself, overseen by good-intentioned South Africans of diverse ethnicities”. Were the composer more in tune to her father’s politics, or born in segregated America, she might have thought twice about the policy. However, existence had sheltered her.

Heritage and Innocence

“I possess a English document,” she stated, “and the officials failed to question me about my race.” So, with her “porcelain-white” skin (as Jet put it), she moved within European circles, buoyed up by their admiration for her late father. She gave a talk about her family’s work at the educational institution and conducted the national orchestra in that location, including the bold final section of her concerto, named: “Dedicated to my Father.” Even though a accomplished player herself, she avoided playing as the soloist in her piece. On the contrary, she consistently conducted as the leader; and so the orchestra of the era played under her baton.

She desired, according to her, she “might bring a change”. Yet in the mid-1950s, the situation collapsed. When government agents discovered her mixed background, she could no longer stay the country. Her citizenship offered no defense, the British high commissioner recommended her departure or be jailed. She returned to England, embarrassed as the extent of her innocence became clear. “This experience was a painful one,” she lamented. Adding to her humiliation was the release in 1955 of her controversial discussion, a year after her forced leaving from the country.

A Familiar Story

As I sat with these memories, I felt a familiar story. The account of being British until you’re not – one that calls to mind Black soldiers who fought on behalf of the English throughout the global conflict and made it through but were refused rightful benefits. Including those from Windrush,